Principles
We write about EarnBet from the perspective of a reader who is about to decide whether to open an account. That decision deserves to be informed by evidence rather than by promotional copy. Three principles guide every page: tell the reader what EarnBet actually does, including the parts that are weaker than the competition; attribute every quantitative claim to a source the reader can verify; and separate the review from the referral by placing all outbound CTAs on a single, labelled /claim/ page. We never praise a feature that the operator does not provide, and we never bury a legitimate complaint behind a disclaimer.
In practice this means our review is sometimes less flattering than EarnBet's own marketing. A welcome bonus is scored on its effective wager requirement, not on the headline percentage. A withdrawal page is rated on the slowest supported network, not on the fastest. We would rather undersell a feature and let the reader be pleasantly surprised than oversell one and lose the reader's trust on the first deposit.
Fact checking
Every page is reviewed by at least two people before publication: the writer, who verifies the primary source, and the lead reviewer, who re-reads for consistency with the rest of the site. Numerical claims (bonus amounts, wager multipliers, withdrawal limits, processing times) are rechecked against the operator's site on the day of publication and again whenever the news block records a term change. When we cite a public health or regulator statistic (in the Responsible Gaming page, for example), we link to the primary source rather than to a secondary summary.
Corrections
If we publish an error, we fix it as soon as it is reported, and we leave a dated note at the bottom of the page explaining what changed and why. For material errors — a wrong withdrawal limit, a wrong bonus wager — the correction is also announced on the home-page news block so that returning readers see it. We do not quietly edit historical claims, and we do not remove pages that embarrass us; we correct them in place and keep the history visible.
We do not accept paid-for corrections, and we do not accept pressure from the operator to soften a review. If EarnBet writes to us to object to something we have published, we treat the objection the same as any other reader correction: we check the facts, we fix the page if the operator is right, we keep the page unchanged if the operator is wrong. The operator's referral fee does not come with any editorial strings attached, and if it ever did, we would end the relationship rather than the policy.